Documentary difference · published immediately
Omnilux Contour Face
Source A reports one number and source B reports another under different or incompletely stated contexts. No adverse interpretation or cross-distance normalization is applied.
Comparability status
not computed: comparability unknown:distance
distanceaveraginginstrumentdeclared vs measured
Evidence
Number passports
26.7 mW/cm2 I · attributed third-party measurement
- Claim ID
- rli:omnilux:contour-face:irradiance-attributed-average:ledmaskscore-com-ea5a39:r1
- Technique
- OHSP-350-IRF · contact geometry · average
- Band
- red nir combined
- Geometry
- surface wearing geometry
- Evidence class
- I
- Measurement event
- event-bb69781e2ea7c2
“26.7 mW/cm2” source quotation
30 mW/cm2 C0 · unqualified source statement
- Claim ID
- rli:omnilux:contour-face:irradiance-declared-fda:accessdata-fda-gov-70c8b4:r1
- Technique
- instrument not stated · distance not stated · statistic not stated by vendor
- Band
- red nir combined
- Geometry
- submission geometry
- Evidence class
- C0
- Measurement event
- not applicable
“Intensity 30mw/cm2 total” source quotation